China will be the next big surprise!

China -ObamaandJinpingChina was all the rage for a short while, but despite chugging along at a premium growth rate to the rest of the world, investors have pretty much focussed on other markets – the U.S. of course but Japan as well of late.

Over decades I’ve come to believe that a pattern has emerged which would imply now is likely an ideal time to consider investing in China but also those economies (also out-of-favour) and sectors hugely dependent upon China.

What’s the problem with China?  This quote summarizes things:

“Over the weekend we saw a bunch of disappointing data out of China that pointed to sluggish economic growth. Industrial production slowed to 9.2% in May, missing expectations for a 9.4% rise. Fixed asset investment was up 19.9%, retail sales were up 12.9%, in line with expectations. Meanwhile inflation cooled, with consumer prices rising 2.1% and producer prices down 2.9%.”

China data chartPositive surprises generally move markets, just as the quick recovery in the US corporate profitability coming out of the financial crisis caught strategists off guard.  I’ve suggested in the recent past that: Global resources boom imminent!  I expect there to be signs by the third quarter of this year that will get things moving.

As you can see by the following graph comparing the Shanghai Composite Index and the S&P 500, the Chinese market requires a strong U.S. economy and market first – then rising exports act like a turbo engaging in an engine, but with a substantial lag.

China Lags US

In the coming months, the US economy will begin to compete with China for raw materials and other commodities, just about the same time as Chinese exports to North America and perhaps Europe will pickup.

Hedge Funds in US stocksOnce markets ‘adjust’ to the inevitable easing off of aggressive monetary stimulus, growth will resume at a more steadied rate for most developed economies, with the exception of China’s economy - which should accelerate rapidly.

Investment dollars cannot help but to move toward China.  The inflation rate both here and there will be running at 2%, but China’s industrial production in this slump is growing nearly 4X faster than the US.  And let’s face it, hedge funds and institutional investors worldwide own as much of the US stock market as they can.

FreeportCountries (Canada & Australia) and industry sectors (Mining, Energy, Steel & Fertilizer etc.) that are sensitive to global growth are oversold and poised to enjoy the same sort of slingshot effect that the Chinese stock market will experience – as dollars shun bonds and dividends in favour of an opportunity to get some upside momentum.

As I recommended in my book Resources Rock (published 2004):

Panda“The ideal time for buying (resource) shares is before all of the above factors are in place – before commodity prices are strong; before revenues are rising steadily; before the company makes a profit; and before the economy is back on its feet.”

Posted in Random Thoughts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Did your strategist predict this market? Get a new strategist!

bull and bearBelow is a commentary I published on March 8th. Like Warren Buffet, I was especially worried about the bond market. During the months before I posted the article, huge inflows into fixed income funds took place. Suddenly investors began selling bond funds to buy stocks.

As I anticipated, bond prices have since declined – many retail investors still don’t realize that a bond fund has altogether different dynamics than holding actual bonds. Barclays US Treas 7-10 year EFTWhen the fund sells bonds (or derivatives replicating the bonds) or the investor redeems then capital losses are crystallized. You will note that I suggested at the time that cash (or equivalents) might be wiser than switching directly into equities.

S&P March 6 to June 6
Why?
I did predict that aggressive fund flows (everyone seemed to be chasing equities) would lift stocks about another 10% (it turned out to be 9.75%) before a serious correction would undermine the bull market. Nonetheless I’ve learned that investors getting sucked into a buying frenzy usually risk buying right up to and at the peak; and then getting whipsawed. Having cash available to put to work during a correction is never such a bad thing.

The following was published March 8th,2013

Selling bonds to buy stocks? Try door #3 instead!

WARREN-largeI have been warning about bonds now for over 6 months. Finally the press is catching on, ensuring that a normal development over the course of a business cycle (whether ignited by natural forces or government intervention) – rising interest rates – might cause investors to panic. Even Warren Buffet has delicately sent up a warning flare in his TV interviews suggesting the worst investment at present is a long term government bond.

And there’s this too:

Over at UBS, a plan is being discussed to reclassify bond investors as “aggressive” investors…UBS is planning a mass mailing to many of its brokerage clients alerting them that they have been reclassified as “aggressive” investors following a recent change in its market outlook that some people inside the firm say reflects growing bearishness in the bond market, particularly over the long term, the FOXBusiness Network has learned… (thank-you for this quote Stephen Bishop of Nova Scotia).

This is scary, but makes sense. If interest rates rise, taking down the valuation of bonds on the balance sheets and assets under management rapidly, then banks and insurance companies (loaded up on bonds during and post-financial crisis) will be hit with more financial woes. They all scrambled back then to reduce risk, but are discovering belatedly that at the drop of a hat they added more risk than they bargained for. What’s the best way to get clients to trim their bonds and bond funds? Have compliance make the security unsuitable.

InterestRatesforUSTreasuriesI’ve been warning about this since last summer….the question is not ‘whether rates will rise’ because in reality the trend (see chart for US Treasuries) has been slowly but unequivocally UP for awhile, especially at the long end of the yield curve.

What happens when everyone wants out all at once? Watch the below video.

DJIAMarch2009-2013What we risk is turning what was a bond bubble into another stock bubble. As I suggested in my previous commentary the stock market has to go higher as money flows (funds from gold exchange-traded fund or ETF redemptions, proceeds from bond sales) gotta go somewhere, and they’ve been moving into the stock market with gusto for many months now. My target was another +10% for the S&P 500 to get to fair value, but markets have a tendency to overshoot (hence to term ‘bubble’) don’t they?

There’s no shame in beating the others – like George in the video – out the door (selling bonds) but it may be wise at this stage to hold onto cash rather than dive into the stock market full tilt. Look for an opportunity to buy back some bonds at higher yields during the summer and top up stocks when the next correction comes.

Posted in Random Thoughts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

BONDS – Where we go from here! (And what about equities?)

tightening bolt“The perception that there remains less risk in fixed income cannot be further from reality – especially because of the post-crisis distortions imposed upon interest rates and the bond market by the US government and replicated around the globe.”

Columbia 10-year T Index

Massive inflows into bonds in the third quarter of last year inspired me write the above warning in my post (October 2012) entitled The BIG Bernanke: Bond risk for the duration!

Since then, bonds have been as disappointing as I predicted. Of course, it is only after-the-fact (8 months later) that bonds are experiencing serious selling pressure. It seems customary that investors wait for concrete evidence (lose some money) before transitioning their portfolios; to the tune of about a -5% loss.

But why has the stock market continued to be so resilient? Ordinarily when interest rates are on the rise, stocks suffer a correction.

  • Maybe it just hasn’t really happened yet. Fund flows often provide strong resistance to fundamentals – money from huge cash reserves and proceeds from bond sales moving into stocks lift prices despite those prices being overvalued.
  • Or perhaps it’s different this time. During historical episodes of significance the fear of FED tightening and its economic impact weighed heavy on valuations. Today it’s more a case of the FED putting the brakes on stimulus, not actually tightening monetary policy.

Fed Tightening Sample2Periods of actual FED tightening can be harsh on stocks. The examples in the chart (not exhaustive, just a sampling) illustrate the point nicely. However there must be a substantial difference between tightening on the one hand, versus reducing stimulus (QE) on the other hand.

I am on record for believing the stock market has gotten ahead of itself but it continues to defy gravity – perhaps a downward adjustment in corporate earnings expectations will fix it. The economy seems to be wavering of late.

Bloomberg News June 3, 2012: “The Institute for Supply Management’s factory index fell to 49, the lowest reading since June 2009, from the prior month’s 50.7, the Tempe, Arizona-based group’s report showed today. Fifty is the dividing line between growth and contraction. The median forecast of 81 economists surveyed by Bloomberg was 51.”

But there may be reason to expect any correction to be mitigated by a FED that wants to simply layoff the accelerator rather than apply the brakes. There have been periods when interest rates have climbed modestly yet stock markets continued to be relatively generous.

I’m simple-minded, so I try to keep things simple. Currently I reckon that investors are discounting S&P 500 earnings using a rate midway between quality corporates and junk. Should fear (of inflation or just summer seasonality) cause an upward adjustment in the discount rate I wouldn’t be surprised to see the S&P 500 suffer a pullback of up to 6%.

ten vs thirty year spreadThe short term outlook for bonds is not much better but medium term might be considerably worse.

At the end of last year, in my discussion Stocks & Bonds…the next 100 years I concluded long bond holders require a real rate of return of 1.5%. For the first few months of 2013, inflation has averaged about 1.5% so the nominal required yield would be 3%. This is pretty close to where long treasury bond yields actually are. Investors would have to expect inflation to rise (to 2%?) and also ‘price-in’ some negative impact from the FED backing off its QE buying program (say 50 basis points?) to create a 4% yield on the 30-year treasury.

If this is possible (arguable), and instead of a 115 basis point spread (current) the 10-year spread approaches say a more reasonable 50 basis points to the 30-year, this implies a 10-year treasury rate of 3.5% instead of 2.12% today.

The duration of the 10-year bond index charted earlier is 5.12%, so a quick back-of-the-envelope estimate of the damage might be an increase in yield of 1.38% X 5.12 = 7.06% decline in the value of the bond or $70.06 per $1000 bond. Ouch! This ignores convexity – so it could be even worse.

The advantage to equities mind you, is that as long as the ROE for companies is growing and exceeds the cost of borrowing then there’s hope for a resumption in positive returns for stocks. Then there’s no real worries until the day when the FED actually decides to tighten. That day doesn’t imminent but when it comes run for cover.

Posted in Random Thoughts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

High Consumer Confidence is bad news for stock market!

happy-cartoon-man-with-shopping-cart-and-houseThe latest consumer confidence release shows a significant improvement.

“Rising home prices and a rising stock market are two key factors that are boosting consumer confidence. And a third factor is rising strength in the jobs market.

The consumer confidence index jumped 7.2 points in May to a recovery best level of 76.2. Adding to the general showing of strength is a 9 tenths upward revision to April to 69.0.”

I’ve published in the past (see Consumer – lower confidence is GOOD news) that consumer confidence, in my experience anyway, is a co-incident indicator. In other words, consumers are confident at the same time as markets are overvalued, and the inverse is also true; consumers are miserable at market bottoms.

Consumers like stocks.As you can see from the adjacent chart (from WSJ) now that consumers are feeling good (whether it’s strong housing prices or whatever) they’re also bullish.

Whenever I warn friends and family that mass bullishness is in reality an ominous market indicator it seems to go in one ear and out the other. Okay whenever I give advice I’m ignored but in this instance it’s darn good advice.

Truth is bottoms in consumer confidence are bullish. The following chart illustrates this quite nicely.

Confident Consumer May 2013Rushing into markets today is simply a bad idea. In fact managing some downside risk (raise cash, sell puts?), would be wise, and then waiting until the next serious dip in consumer confidence (and mass bearishness) occurs is a much better idea.

Since employment in the U.S. hasn’t improved enough to warrant such optimism, it must be rising housing prices (a brand new bubble?) and stock market valuations – in both cases one might argue that they are inflated by extraordinarily low interest rates (which are already creeping up). Summer cometh and the ice under the market is getting thinner.

 

 

Posted in Random Thoughts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Does divergence of stocks and commodities tell us anything at all?

Chart Of The Day_ S&P 500 Vs_Page_1I read a blurb from Business Insider – entitled One Of The Biggest Arguments Of Fed Haters Is Getting Obliterated Before Our Eyes – discussing the adjacent chart (published on May 15th) that still has me confused. Here is a direct quote:

“Throughout the market rally, which started in early 2009, haters have argued that the whole thing is a Fed-backed Ponzi scheme, and that people are only jumping into stocks because of easy money and dollar debasement, not due to any fundamental reasons.
But that argument has been obliterated in recent months, as a divergence has grown between stocks and commodities.
If stocks and commodities move together, then you can make an argument that people are just putting their money in anything but paper currency. But when they’re moving separately, that argument falls apart, because it shows that there’s another fundamental driver.”

It seems to me that this divergence between stocks and commodities is exactly what we should observe if the rallying market is a Fed-backed Ponzi scheme, although describing it this way is far too simplistic. To me, it implies that the recent scramble to invest in equities is indeed driven by a lack of investment alternatives. If the economy were fundamentally improving, then demand (there’s no inflation to speak of) would also drive commodity prices. Clearly that has not been the case…..yet!

I am on record as believing the stock market is now artificially inflated by artificially low interest rates. As I’ve suggested previously, this will get fixed once stimulus wanes – could be next month or next year. But the availability of so much capital should continue to work its way into the real economy. No doubt Bernanke and gang are waiting as long as it takes for this to occur. There’ve been signs supporting this (housing stability) but also evidence that it is taking much longer than any of us expected (slowdown in manufacturing and stubborn unemployment).

TrainWhat we may next witness is a huge reallocation of bets….out of income and financials (what was hot) into commodities (what will be hot) when the economy gathers momentum. What will look like a correction in the overall stock market (panic selling whenever interest rates do get a bump) will coincide with a shift from yield to basic industry (oils, rails, mining, manufacturing etc.).

The old train (I took this photo at Lake Louise, AB a week ago) is bound to pull into the station in due course, and you’ll want to be boarded on the next one while there are still seats available.

Posted in Random Thoughts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Stay in Equities? Would you drive off a cliff?

swindlerIt’s time again to send up a warning flare. Markets haven’t really responded to warnings from Warren Buffet about bonds, and quotes like the following are becoming more abundant:

“Stay invested in equities. The break to all-time new highs in many stock markets suggests that the recent pullback is complete. We believe the higher lows in many markets speak to the strength of the medium-term bull trend that has been unfolding since 2009.”

What was just experienced was a hiccup, not a ‘pullback’. For the most part, I am in agreement (and wrote about it back in 2009, rather than in hindsight) that we are in a long bull trend – both global economy and markets. However this does not mean you should ‘stay’ with any asset class. Advice from large financial firms is always suspect. This quote is from A Maverick Investor’s Guidebook:

The larger banks and insurance companies, most now owning their own investment dealer subsidiaries, would like nothing better than to have your investments less volatile and secure even if they don’t grow at all. If your money just stays put, they can consistently charge you fees, forecast their revenues based on those fees, and invest revenues in real estate and other assets that will make more money for the firm.

I am not being critical of these companies, just realistic. All the services they provide (consumer and corporate banking, mortgage lending, international funds transfers, and so forth) wouldn’t be available if they weren’t in business, and to be in business requires them to behave as businesses.

Now that there is market activity after years of disinterest from the investing public, no financial services business wants it to end.

If the FED really is considering unwinding its quantitative easing (QE) program, then higher interest rates will impact the value of your investments; their fees will decline, but revenues will surely decline much more if you get out of higher margin securities…..i.e. equities. But as I outlined in an earlier posting – Rising i-rates: More than bonds will get hammered! – it is in your best interest to avoid danger when it’s imminent.

DSC_0176Put another way, you wouldn’t attempt to drive along the Pacific Coastal Highway in a straight line. Similarly, a buy and hold (‘staying’) approach in the markets is likely to end badly.

Why send up the warning flares I mentioned earlier? Over my career I’ve learned to expect trouble when:

warning flareSummer is coming!

warning flareInterest rates could begin to rise!

So don’t hesitate, if you feel the need to slow down and lean into the curve (sell stocks) it may cost you some commissions but ultimately save your bacon.

Posted in Random Thoughts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Tempted to buy gold? Better to be patient!

goldbarsOn January 8th, I published Why the price of gold skyrocketed and why it’s over! I’m beginning to see (finally) some acknowledgement that the price of gold inflated by the fear that a collapse in the global financial infrastructure was imminent, is rapidly losing its lustre.

The price of gold has fallen 20% from its peak, and on CNBC the talking heads are asking: ‘Is it time again to buy gold?’

Gold April-13Because the price of gold is more volatile than a manic-depressive without meds, it’d difficult to determine how low (or high) it can go. Why am I sure it can go much lower? I was at Arizona Bike Week and saw some jewellery (biker stuff…skulls and such). I noticed that a sterling silver ring was selling for $300, but a solid gold one was nearly $5000. Now if I wouldn’t even consider buying the gold ring after several JD shots and beers (and the Doobie Brothers performing a few feet away) then it’s obvious that the gold/silver ratio is out of whack.

gold-silver-ratio-1882As I type this, gold is $1424/oz. and silver is $23/oz. Therefore the ratio of gold to silver is >60. I find that 40 to 1 has got to be coming (no real reason, why not?) suggesting a target price for gold of $920/oz.

But wait. If silver is in such abundance, and the global financial system stabilizing with each passing day, should we not assume a more modest silver price will prevail in due course?

Silver Price Chart April-13If the environment we’re evolving into resembles the 90′s at all, then $5/oz. silver doesn’t seem outrageous which would (at 40 ratio) mean a gold price of $200. Crazy? It’s happened in my lifetime. However, let’s say $15/oz. silver – industrial demand should pick up – which puts gold at $600/oz.

Will bullion escape this perilous situation? Will gold bugs be as fortunate as James Bond in the following clip from Goldfinger?

Posted in Random Thoughts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 13 Comments